Just Another Reason The Public Should Never Spend Money On Sports Arenas

As far as wasting public money goes, there's nothing quite like a sports arena

  • Share
  • Read Later
Mike Zarrilli / Getty Images

The Confederation of North, Central American and Caribbean Association Football (CONCACAF) Gold Cup quarterfinal game between Mexico and Trinidad & Tobago at the Georgia Dome in Atlanta on July 20, 2013.

As far as wasting public money goes, there’s nothing quite like a sports arena.

Not so long ago — think the days of the L.A. Coliseum, maybe — cities built stadiums affordably, with versatility and civic purpose in mind. Today, the people of Atlanta plan to give the Falcons $550 million to build a wacky mess of glass polygons and luxury boxes. We know this is silly. The existing stadium is 20 years old, a perfectly fine place to watch a football game. If the team’s billionaire owner needs a new stadium for the sake of new revenue streams, surely he could fund one himself.

But elected officials and sometimes even voters are often too caught up in awe over a stadium’s new design, or too pleased with the recent success of their team, or too piqued by some dubious economic impact report, to envision what things will look like years down the line. They imagine that paying up might exempt them from future shakedowns. They imagine that paying up guarantees a long-term commitment from a team to a city.

But the story of Bridgeport, Conn., its Sound Tigers of the American Hockey League, and the Webster Bank Arena where they play provide the latest object lesson in just how misguided those assumptions usually are.

Despite relocation speculation, Sound Tigers remain committed to Bridgeport” read the headline in Friday morning’s Connecticut Post. “Remain committed” are words you often encounter when team owners feel slight guilt about breaking agreements with the public, and those words generally mean the precise opposite of what you’d expect them to mean.

As they do here. The Sound Tigers, it was announced later on Friday, will soon move to Long Island to play in a renovated Nassau Coliseum in Uniondale. The Coliseum would otherwise have lacked a full-time hockey tenant once the New York Islanders moved to Brooklyn in 2015. It should be noted that the Sound Tigers issued a non-denial denial after the announcement, saying that ownership had not told them that a deal was in place to move to Long Island. But because Bridgeport and the Islanders share owners, it seems certain they will follow orders.

The Sound Tigers’ agreement with the city and the arena had called for them to stay there until 2020, a few months shy of the arena’s 19th birthday. Now the arena will in all likelihood lose its primary tenant before it turns a still-young 14, sticking it with second-tier concerts — the bigger tours head for Hartford or Mohegan Sun, or skip small-potatoes Connecticut altogether — and Fairfield University basketball, unless it poaches a hockey team from another city.

That’s not what Bridgeport had in mind. Consider the goals when the $56 million arena was built: “We are now on the brink of doing what people thought was unthinkable just a few years ago — making Bridgeport a place not only where people want to live and work, but also a place people want to visit,” then-Mayor Joseph Ganim told the Boston Globe (Ganim later spent seven years in prison for corruption-related offenses, some of which concerned kickbacks and overruns in the construction of the arena).

So, today, is Bridgeport a place people want to visit? Not really.

No real neighborhood developed around the arena. It’s a place where you park and then leave. And the data concurs. Arts, entertainment, hotels, restaurants, and recreation makes up 8.4 percent of Bridgeport’s jobs, according to the most recent American Community Survey. In Hartford, that sector has 13 percent of the city’s jobs; in New Haven, which lost its arena because of the pressure Bridgeport’s glimmering new one put on it, that sector still has 10 percent of the jobs. The story is the same when looking at raw numbers rather than percentages. New Haven and Hartford are both smaller than Bridgeport, yet both have more entertainment-related jobs.

The Sound Tigers — who last season ranked No. 18 in attendance out of the league’s 30 teams, after ranking No. 20 the year before, and No. 23 the year before that — have not turned Bridgeport’s fortunes around. That’s no surprise; they’re just a minor-league hockey team. $56 million, of course, was far too much to spend to figure that out.

But the cost to society seems just a little less steep if others can learn from Bridgeport’s lesson.

5 comments
ozette11
ozette11

Sacramento another case--a 258 miilion dollar arean shoved down there throats-without a public vote.

DanBruce
DanBruce

Atlanta won't adequately fund playgrounds and after-school programs for its kids, but it can get all excited about giving a billionaire sports owner a $ billion stadium where he can entertain his rich friends, and the city can get goose bumps about providing millionaire players a $ billion temple in which to house their worshippers on Sundays. The whole sports scene in America, not just Atlanta, is sick, sick, sick. As an Atlantan, I personally boycott anything connected with professional sports or athletes, and urge others to do likewise until an effort to restore some perspective is demonstrated by the teams, players, sports media, and so on. I'm not expecting much change, though. An influential handful of people are making too much money to worry about what sports is doing to diminish our national fiber. 

nyifancentral
nyifancentral

Where was your aricle when the Mets, Yankees, Nets, Devils all got taxpayer funded buildings? Where is that article on the taxpayer funding virtually every NHL team receives? Where's your article on that 16m tax exemption James Dolan receives for the Cablevision Garden. 


Oh yes, who saved the Bridgeport Sound Tigers when Roy Boe went into bankruptcy for Bridgeport? The same man who renovated it out of his own pocket, Islander and Sound Tiger owner, Charles Wang, who owns the hotel next to the Nassau Coliseum, who's managing Webster Bank Arena.

GeorgeAdamrovich
GeorgeAdamrovich like.author.displayName 1 Like

Let the owners pay for a stadium if they want a new one. It's time that the taxpayers get smart!!!!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 235 other followers