Keeping Score

Should Women Basketball Players Shoot On Lower Rims?

Geno Auriemma, coach of UConn and the U.S. women's national team, recommends lowering the baskets to increase the popularity of women's hoops. Why that likely won't happen.

  • Share
  • Read Later
Jessica Hill / AP

Connecticut coach Geno Auriemma speaks with Kelly Faris, left, as Brianna Banks listens during practice before the NCAA college basketball team's media day in Storrs, Conn., Oct. 16, 2012.

When University of Connecticut women’s coach Geno Auriemma, a seven-time national champion with the Huskies who also led this year’s U.S. Olympic team to gold in London, talks about changing up the women’s game, you have to listen. His latest idea, however, seems quite radical: Auriemma thinks women’s basketball should lower the rims, to increase offensive output and generate more interest in the game. The Washington Post explains Auriemma’s reasoning:

“What makes fans not want to watch women’s basketball is that some of the players can’t shoot and they miss layups and that forces the game to slow down,” U-Conn. Coach Geno Auriemma told the Hartford Courant.

“How do help improve that? Lower the rim [from 10 feet]. Do you think the average fan knows that the net is lower in women’s volleyball than men’s volleyball? It’s about seven inches shorter, so the women have the chance for the same kind of success at the net [as the men].”

The numbers tell the story in women’s college hoops where only 11 Division I teams shot 45 percent or better from the field during the 2011-12 season. (The Huskies were second at 47.7 percent behind undefeated Baylor at 48.8). In contrast, 109 men’s Division I teams eclipsed the mark (via ESPN).

“Let’s say the average men’s player is 6-5 and the average woman is 5-11,” Auriemma told the Courant. “Let’s lower the rim seven inches; let’s say 7.2 inches to honor Title IX [instituted in 1972]. If you lower it, the average fan likely wouldn’t even notice it.

“Now there would be fewer missed layups because the players are actually at the rim [when they shoot]. Shooting percentages go up. There would be more tip-ins.”

There are only so many Brittney Griners who can dunk and shoot 60.9 percent for the season. For the rest of women’s college players, that means relying on jump shots and layups to put points on the board.

Auriemma said he plans to propose the idea to the NCAA’s rules committee along with a suggestion to reduce the shot-clock from 30 to 24 seconds and institute an eight-second backcourt rule to help speed up play.

(MORE: U.S. Women Win Fifth Consecutive Olympic Gold. Will the WNBA Profit?)

Auriemma’s idea does make some intuitive sense. Softball fields, for example, are smaller than baseball fields. Women golfers tee off closer to the green than men do.  Basketballs for women’s players are already smaller than those for men, to account for physical differences. Why shouldn’t the height of the rims account for height differences too?

However, the proposal is fraught with practical problems. As Deadspin’s Barry Petchesky explains:

The execution seems impossible, because the change would have to come at every level, not just college. Kids grow up playing on fixed 10-foot rims in schools, parks, and playgrounds. Adjustable hoops are expensive. Very few municipalities have the money or the motivation to install separate girls’ courts with 9’5″ baskets.

The alternative to making changes from the ground up would be girls getting to college and overshooting rims suddenly shorter than what they’ve been playing on their whole lives. Which would mean more missed layups and less scoring, defeating the entire purpose of the rule change. And then, unless the WNBA adopts the new rules as well, it’d be another adjustment when they hit the pros. Auriemma’s proposal is coming from the right place, it’s just 100 years too late.

What does one of the best women’s basketball players of all-time think of Auriemma’s idea? “I think Geno is bored,” says Nancy Lieberman, a Hall of Famer who earned the nickname “Lady Magic” during her college playing days in the late-1970s, and recently served as coach for an NBA Developmental League team. “I don’t have a clue why he would say that.” To Lieberman, lowering the rims would stunt the evolution of the women’s game. “Why lower the rim when we’re getting to the rim,” says Lieberman. “The history of the game says we’ll get there early and often. I know of 13- and 14-year old kids who are learning how to dunk now. Don’t go backwards.”

(MORE: 2010 TIME Q&A With Geno Auriemma)

29 comments
BeastyBoogie
BeastyBoogie

@TIME I support Coach Geno Auriemma... but lowering the rims coach?! No... Raise the mens? Maybe.

go2boat4winds
go2boat4winds

@TIME Hell no! They're pretty damn good on the regular rims. Better than most guys.

ZICONOTIDE
ZICONOTIDE

@TIME Should @TIME actually write an article worth reading? I'd reprimand the editor that approved this article, & the DA that wrote it.

chipotleval
chipotleval

@knownastron would defiantly change the game. It makes sense to do so but I don't know if it would actually give the sport a bigger fan base

NancyLieberman
NancyLieberman

@Ovary_act Heck no. Why would we. We dont need the rims lowered.

MARDIGUS
MARDIGUS

@TIME No. The ball is smaller. Good enough. Women waiting for a George Mikan figure to advance the game

cwomble3rd
cwomble3rd

@TIME maybe they should, it would not change the way I view the woman's game.

utteacher7
utteacher7

@TIME I think this is much more demoralizing for women than being put in "binders".

WhatMotherKnows
WhatMotherKnows

@TIME HELL NO! Men are so afraid that women do EVERYTHING BETTER!

cbart0703
cbart0703

@TIME no way! We've survived and excelled. We don't need to go backwards.

Catty_Baby08
Catty_Baby08

@Aizukku @TIME @_pandorica @vaan_ff Well, I'd certainly benefit more from it.

_StevieBoy_
_StevieBoy_

If women are doing well, one would wonder y men Basketball Players not Shoot on higher Rims?

Osloweknownas
Osloweknownas

@TIME Should the Press have investigated Watergate because there were 4 dead bodies involved. Ohh nevermind. Forgot nobody died in Watergate

FireFlyx0905
FireFlyx0905

@TIME No, men should shoot on higher rims.

JackiePsarianos
JackiePsarianos

@TIME Only if women basketball players average the same height as their male counterparts.

Sh0Nuff85
Sh0Nuff85

why so more men can clown the womens more? no, geno. RT @TIME: Should women basketball players shoot on lower rims? | http://t.co/I6pJPzqC

emdee1172
emdee1172

@TIME no they shouldn't if their doin fine on regular.why fix wat NT broken!!

BestFoodBaby
BestFoodBaby

No, but thanks for asking. You're welcome @TIME Should women basketball players shoot on lower rims?

lastrova
lastrova

I think it's an idea whose time has come.  And I don't see a problem with women practicing on higher hoops, so the equipment demands up and down the scale need not change: Higher hoops for practice and lower hoops for games will still work.  And whether women's basketball is as competitive or intrinsically interesting as men's should not be the modus operandi.  It's about pleasure and the joy of playing sport and being physically active.   

Martian_14
Martian_14

Blah!

Competitive women's sports are not as cool as man's.  They can lower the hoop as much as they want, it will still be tedious to watch ladies playing basketball. There will never be a "Michaela" Jordan...

ironyman2
ironyman2

Not ready for that change yet. The interest in the women's game has begun to grow. It doesn't need a negative, such as the lowering standards cry that will inevitably follow the changes.

A growing number of girls are now interested in watching and playing sports. More parents support their daughters in sports. These duaghters will raise daughters who play sports. Will The Game every be as big for women as for men? Probably not. While many many spend hours watching games on some screen somewhrere, and many still play sports for fun, women have expanded interests. More women are spending their time pursing degrees and on their jobs. The ones with kids must spend time there. Women are more likely to decide on a lunch out with friends rather than a day at the ballpark.

BeastyBoogie
BeastyBoogie

@lastrova Why would you practice on something that you won't use in a game? That will completely destroy shooting percentages.

ironyman2
ironyman2

Correction; that should be "many men spend time watching and playing sports ..."


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 233 other followers